|
24.05.05
Since the tragedy of 9/11, the President of the Russian Federation has never missed an
opportunity to remind the Western world that his country was the first one to stage a war against
global terrorism. Translated from the "Kremlin language" it meant fighting against the Chechens,
who refuse to disarm themselves. Putin is definitely right in claiming that Russia's battle against
them had started much earlier than the 9/11-terror attack took place. Revolt of the nations of
North Caucasus opposing foreign occupation dates back to the end of the 18th century, even
before Tsarist Russia finished conquering the region. Since then each and every uprising was
quelled brutally accompanied by genocide and deportation of the local population. Every new
generation of the North Caucasian people tried, in vain, to regain its freedom.
The same repeated itself during the nineties of the previous century. But then, the new players –
Islamic extremist organizations from abroad, entered the scene. They decided to transform
Chechnya, which managed to gain its independence, into their main bridgehead inside the
collapsed Soviet Union. Putin, who rose to power against the background of the infiltration of
Islamic militants to Daghestan, used the situation to declare that the Chechen liberation
movement is an indivisible part of the global terrorist network. Foreign Islamic elements, which
supported Chechnya, were put on the Russian terror list. But there was "not enough room" on
this list for the rest of the terrorist organizations, which were not suspected of hostile activity
against the Kremlin.
Furthermore, several of them earned Russian sympathy and were "honored" with Moscow's
courting. This was Putin`s revival of the traditional Soviet policy. During the USSR era its
leadership used to divide the international terrorists into categories; "freedom fighters" and
"radical elements". The first served Moscow's geopolitical interests and received its support.
The others, acting against the USSR, or declining to accept its sponsorship, were labeled
"terrorists". Today Moscow's policies and methods are identical.
The pro-Iranian Hezbollah stands out among those who benefit from the Kremlin's support. Its
fighters are guilty of murdering hundreds of American and French citizens in the eighties.
During the previous decade its emissaries committed two huge terrorist acts in Argentina, killing
almost 120 people. Today Hezbollah`s terrorists are fighting coalition forces in Iraq.
Putin`s declarations about "Russia's uncompromising battle against international terrorism" are
taking place simultaneously with the contacts of the Russian Ministry of foreign Affairs with the
leaders of Hezbollah. Their emissaries in Russia recruit potential suicide bombers without
restraint or opposition on behalf of the local authorities. They purchase arms in the areas of the
ex-USSR, which are now under Russian control. Russian ex-military experts train militants of
Hezbollah before they infiltrate Iraq.
Covert "love affair" – the full story, part I
The Imam asks for Russian help
The relations between Russia and the Shiite's religious leadership in Lebanon started to develop
in the beginning of the seventies. The spiritual leader of the Lebanese Shia community, Imam
Moussa Al-Sadr, visited Moscow in 1972 and asked Soviet authorities to issue humanitarian aid
to his people.
At the same time cooperation between the Marxist factions of the PLO that were active in
Lebanon and Soviet military intelligence – GRU, intensified greatly. Several soviet officers
(speaking fluent Arabic) even visited Palestinian terrorist training camps in the Bekaa Valley in
Lebanon between 1972-1975. Using their connections in PLO they managed to establish contact
with Iranian opposition members and radical Lebanese Shiite groups, which also were training in
Palestinian camps at that time.
Later, these contacts between Shiite extremists and GRU officers, allowed access of the Soviet
intelligence to the AMAL and the Hezbollah leaders. In the beginning of the eighties, after Al-
Sadr`s disappearance (1978) Moscow established tight relations with Nabih Berri, following the
strengthening of his position as AMAL`s leader. The head of the KGB branch in Beirut, Yuri
Perfiliev, and GRU officers acting in Syria and Lebanon, conducted links with Berri. On the
contrary, Hezbollah in the beginning tried to avoid any direct contact with Moscow
representatives at that time. Its spiritual leaders even expressed hostility towards the USSR
because of the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan and oppression of the Muslim nations in the
Soviet Union.
In September 1985 Imad Mughnieh`s (the head of the special operations unit of Hezbollah)
militants abducted four employees of the Russian Embassy in Beirut. In exchange for setting
them free the abductors demanded to cease all Syrian Army actions against Hezbollah, FATAH,
Sunni radicals and left wing militia bases in Beirut and Tripoli. Moscow accepted these terms
and put pressure on Syria, stopping the fighting.
Concurrently, the head of the KGB in Beirut Perfiliev, using the sources of Walid Jumblatt`s
intelligence services made a direct contact with Hezbollah`s spiritual leader Sheikh Muhammad
Fadlallah. A day after they have met for the second time, three of the kidnapped employees of
the Russian embassy were set free. The fourth one – a senior officer of the KGB, was murdered,
but the main reason of his death was more in the power rivalry between the KGB and Soviet
military intelligence in Lebanon and less in Hezbollah`s intentions to harm Soviet
representatives. After that incident there was no substantial data on contacts between Moscow
and Hezbollah for at least a decade. But, according to the testimony of GRU agent in Sweden
Stig Berling, Soviet military intelligence continued to cooperate with terrorist organizations in
Lebanon until 1993.
Azerbaijani Defense Minister's deputy and the head of the Azerbaijani secret service Department
of operations (until April 2005) Taufik Babayev, claims that in 1994 the Russian intelligence
SVR (ex-Foreign Department of the KGB in the Soviet era) tried to renew contacts with
Hezbollah. Babayev was responsible for keeping an eye on Iranian activities directed against his
country and Tehran's connections with Islamic extremist organizations.
According to Israeli sources Babayev discovered that at the end of 1994 the head of SVR,
Evgeny Primakov, using his close relations with Syria and Iran, found a channel to contact
Hezbollah.
By the way, the same Yuri Perfiliev, who managed relations with Fadlallah during the eighties,
worked for the SVR in 1994.
Diplomats on a Secret Service
Primakov`s appointment to the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry in January, 1996, brought
drastic changes in Moscow's foreign policy. The pro-western orientation of his predecessor gave
way to the revival of traditional Soviet diplomacy. The main manifestation of the change was the
process of rapprochement between Russia and the Arab world, India and Iran. Concurrently,
Primakov continued to define the goals of the Russian intelligence services. His close confidant,
Vyacheslav Trubnikov, was appointed to lead the SVR (Sluzhba Vnesnei Razvedki), and
coordinated all actions with his patron throughout his tenure in the office. Primakov has
continued nurturing all of the initiatives and projects that he started as head of the SVR. Several
months after he had replaced the previous Foreign Minister, he started to seek contacts with
Hezbollah. In December, 1997, the Russian ambassador to Israel, Michail Bogdanov, admitted
during an interview that Moscow constantly keeps in touch with Sheikh Nasralla`s subordinates.
According to him, the contacts are kept primarily through the Russian embassy in Beirut.
Bogdanov noted: "our cooperation with the organization is meant to encourage restraint. Less
then a month before this interview, Primakov had visited Beirut. While he was conducting
official meetings with Lebanese government figures, his attendant, Viktor Posovaluk, secretly
met with the leaders of Hezbollah, including its General Secretary's deputy, Naim Kassem. Later
in Moscow, during his meeting with journalists, Posovaluk called Hezbollah a "national
liberation organization".
He came back to Lebanon in May, 1998, and again unofficially met with Naim Kassem.,
Posovaluk was conducting the contacts with Hezbollah on behalf of the Russian Foreign Office
until he died in the summer of 1999. All this time he was the Russian President's special envoy
to the Middle East and a deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs. Incidentally, he also managed
contacts with representatives of the Taliban.
After his death, several meetings between representatives of the Russian Foreign Office and
Hezbollah took place in 2000-2001. During his conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Sharon
in November, 2003, President Putin admitted the existence of such contacts, but claimed that
they were conducted solely for the sake of receiving information on three abducted Israeli
soldiers.
Coming soon - the next part of the series:
Role of the official leaders of the Muslims of Russia in Moscow's relations with Hezbollah
Kremlin legitimizes Hezbollah`s actions
Hezbollah`s spiritual leader calls for Russian involvement in the Middle East
Back to Main | Part II | Part III | Part IV
Related items:
War in Lebanon Divided Between Russia and Germany (08.08.06)
|